Payment protection insurance (PPI) claims guide
Looking to learn more about payment protection insurance (PPI) claims? Dive into our comprehensive guide.
Claims
Contents
Contents
Contents
Contents
Contents
Contents
Are you looking to make a claim for PPI? Check to see if you're eligible below or read our comprehensive guide.
If you’re not quite ready to speak to an expert, we’ve got some great content and tools to help you on your way.
Looking to learn more about payment protection insurance (PPI) claims? Dive into our comprehensive guide.
Need advice about payment protection insurance? Receive a free initial consultation from a claims specialist.
To understand the key terms used in payment protection insurance claims, explore our extensive glossary.
Need additional support? These organisations are handy if you need help with payment protection insurance.
Looking for answers? We've addressed the most common questions about payment protection insurance claims.
Discover how to turn mis‑sold PPI into cash back—track down old policies, judge unfair sales, check the slim routes still open after the 2019 deadline, gather proof, navigate every complaint and appeal step, estimate tax‑affected payouts, and dodge costly claims‑firm fees.
Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) is a type of insurance policy designed to help borrowers maintain repayments on loans, credit cards, or other financial commitments if they become unable to work due to illness, accident, or unemployment. PPI was frequently marketed alongside mortgages, personal loans and credit cards in the UK as a safeguard, but many consumers were often unaware of its intricacies or suitability to their circumstances. It rose to significant prominence—and controversy—when millions of policies were found to have been mis-sold by banks and other lenders.
PPI policies are usually added to your debt automatically or sold aggressively to make the monthly instalments seem more manageable. Despite PPI’s potential benefits, its reputation is overshadowed by allegations of widespread mis-selling. In particular, numerous borrowers were told that having PPI was mandatory, or were misled about the coverage provided, resulting in them paying for an insurance product that they did not truly need.
Many individuals only discovered PPI on their statements when consumer watchdogs and regulators in the UK, such as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), began to investigate PPI sales practices in detail. These investigations led to thousands of complaints and billions of pounds in compensation paid to customers who had been mis-sold PPI. Understanding PPI and the reasons behind its widespread mis-selling is fundamental, especially if you suspect you might have unknowingly paid for a policy.
To grasp the essence of PPI, it helps to consider the main characteristics and why it was introduced:
Primary purpose: Protects monthly repayments in certain circumstances, such as job loss or illness.
Method of payment: Typically added as a premium to your monthly loan or credit card payment.
Limitations: Many policies have strict exclusions, leaving some policyholders unable to benefit when they needed it most.
The sheer scale of PPI mis-selling in the UK has made it one of the largest consumer financial scandals in British history.
Critics argue that PPI policies were often expensive and offered minimal cover compared to other insurance types. Additionally, many policyholders were ineligible for payouts due to age limits, pre-existing medical conditions, or employment status, and only discovered these exclusions upon trying to claim. Over time, banks were directed to contact customers who might have been mis-sold PPI, resulting in large-scale refunds and ongoing reforms in how lenders market insurance products.
Below is a brief table summarising key points about PPI policies:
Feature | Description |
---|---|
Coverage | Loan or credit repayment if ill, unemployed, or injured |
Typical cost | Added monthly to loan or credit card payments |
Known issues | High premiums, strict exclusions, mis-selling by lenders |
Regulatory attention | Major investigations by the FCA and consumer advocates |
Understanding the fundamentals of PPI is an essential first step. If you think you may have been affected, it is crucial to review your finance records or statements to determine whether a PPI policy was attached. In the following sections, we delve deeper into how you can identify PPI, the nature of mis-selling practices, and how to initiate a claim if you are eligible for compensation.
Recognising whether you ever had PPI can be tricky, especially if your loan or credit card dates back several years. Many consumers either overlooked PPI on their statements or assumed it was required to secure credit. Yet identifying a PPI policy is central to determining whether you might have been mis-sold and are eligible to make a claim.
Often, lenders listed PPI under ambiguous names, such as “payment cover,” “loan protection,” or “credit insurance,” rather than explicitly labelling it as PPI. Therefore, a quick review of your credit agreement might not provide sufficient clarity. Instead, you may have to methodically check old finance documents for any references to a monthly insurance premium.
Below are some ways to figure out if you had PPI:
Review credit documentation
Examine older loan agreements, credit card statements, and final settlement letters. Look for keywords like “payment cover,” “loan care,” or “credit protection.”
Request statements from lenders
If you no longer have the original paperwork, contact your lender in writing or by phone, requesting historical statements. By law, lenders are required to supply information they hold on file, although older records might be archived.
Check for single-premium PPI
Some PPI policies were charged as a lump sum at the beginning of the loan. If the total amount borrowed seems higher than expected, a single-premium PPI policy may have been added.
Many PPI policies were hidden behind vague terminology, making it challenging for consumers to realise they had been sold insurance at all.
If you uncover evidence of a PPI policy, make a record of the policy number, premium amounts, and the dates you held it. This data is invaluable if you decide to pursue a claim. Any information showing how (or if) the policy was explained at the point of sale can also prove integral to demonstrating mis-selling.
Should you remain uncertain, you might try submitting a Subject Access Request (SAR) to your lender, which obliges them to provide all personal data they hold about you. This approach can reveal unexpected policies or confirm whether a policy existed. Once you’ve established that you did hold PPI, your next step is to examine whether the policy was mis-sold.
Mis-selling occurs when a financial product is sold to a consumer in a way that contravenes regulatory guidelines or best practices, often leaving customers disadvantaged. In the context of PPI, vast numbers of policies were mis-sold across the UK, leading to a large-scale compensation programme. Lenders were found to have sold PPI under misleading circumstances, such as implying it was mandatory or failing to disclose crucial terms.
Common mis-selling methods include:
Lack of informed consent
Some consumers were not made aware that PPI had been added to their loan or credit agreement.
Misrepresenting necessity
Borrowers were led to believe they had to purchase PPI to get credit approval.
Unsuitable policies
Policies were sold to those who could never benefit, such as individuals who were self-employed or had pre-existing medical conditions excluded under the terms.
Inadequate disclosure of costs and exclusions
Exorbitant premiums or strict clauses were not clearly explained at the point of sale.
Mis-sold PPI was so pervasive that millions of consumers received payouts over the last decade, highlighting the scale of unjust practices.
Below is a short overview of factors often cited in successful mis-selling claims:
Factor | Example |
---|---|
Inadequate disclosure | No clear explanation of coverage, costs, or the policy’s optional nature |
Pressure or coercion | Implying credit approval hinged on policy acceptance |
Unsuitability | Selling to self-employed or retired individuals who couldn’t claim |
Pre-existing coverage | Overlapping insurance made the additional PPI redundant |
Ultimately, if you discover that you were told PPI was required, or the product was added without proper explanation, these are strong indicators that you may have been mis-sold. The flood of consumer complaints led the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to require lenders to compensate those who could demonstrate they never needed or wanted the policy, nor fully understood its implications. In the following sections, we explore eligibility criteria, claim deadlines, and how to lodge a complaint effectively.
Before pursuing a PPI claim, it is important to confirm if you meet certain eligibility requirements. Even if you suspect you’ve been mis-sold, not all situations will qualify. Lenders and regulatory bodies assess whether the sale was truly inappropriate and whether you, as the customer, suffered from lack of disclosure or high-pressure tactics.
Below is a non-exhaustive checklist to help determine potential eligibility:
Existence of a PPI policy
You must identify a policy attached to your account, whether it was cancelled or still active when you discovered the issue.
Evidence of mis-selling
You were not told that PPI was optional.
Existing medical conditions or your employment status made you ineligible.
You felt pressured or believed it was required.
Timing
The PPI must have been sold by a regulated entity during a period when they were under the oversight of UK regulators.
Substantial lack of explanation
If the costs, terms, or exclusions were not properly explained, you may have a viable claim.
In many instances, the borrower’s circumstances rendered them ineligible for PPI benefits, yet the policy was still added, indicating clear mis-selling.
Being retired, unemployed, or in part-time work at the time of the loan could automatically invalidate a PPI claim if the policy wouldn’t cover such scenarios. Similarly, if you already had insurance through your employer for sickness or redundancy, paying for an additional PPI policy could have been unnecessary.
Even if your PPI was sold long ago, you may qualify for a refund. The key factors are proving the policy existed and demonstrating mis-selling. Eligibility does not guarantee success, but it does provide a framework for reviewing your situation and deciding whether you should proceed with a formal claim.
One important aspect of PPI claims was the official deadline introduced by the FCA, which fell on 29 August 2019. However, certain exceptions and scenarios still allow a claim beyond this date, especially if you only recently discovered you had PPI, or if there were personal circumstances preventing you from filing in time.
Key points to consider regarding deadlines:
General regulatory deadline
29 August 2019 was the primary cut-off for most PPI complaints.
Exceptions
If your lender or broker has written to you after the deadline, or you became aware of PPI long after 2019, you may still have grounds to proceed. In some rare cases, personal factors like serious illness during the claim window can allow a late submission.
Limitation Act 1980
This legislation typically imposes a six-year limit from the time you became aware (or should have become aware) of the issue. If you only recently realised a mis-selling situation, the “clock” might be argued to start later.
In exceptional cases, you may be able to argue that you only discovered the mis-selling much later, effectively resetting your claim window.
Below is a short table illustrating some potential deadline factors:
Factor | Impact on Claim Deadline |
---|---|
Initial FCA-imposed deadline (2019) | Most claims expected before 29 August 2019 |
Discovery of PPI post-deadline | May allow you to argue you became aware recently |
Personal circumstances or incapacity | May justify late claims if you were unable to act |
Specific lender extensions | Some lenders may accept claims on a case-by-case basis |
If you missed the 2019 deadline yet believe you have a valid reason for your tardiness—such as being unaware of the policy—gather evidence that clearly supports these circumstances. Lenders and the Financial Ombudsman Service will want proof before opening a claim outside the established time limits. While a late claim is typically more challenging, it is not always impossible. Your next step is to begin the complaint process clearly and systematically, as outlined in the next section.
Filing a complaint about a mis-sold PPI policy involves a structured approach. Although each case differs slightly, you can increase your chances of success by methodically following these steps:
Identify the lender, account numbers, and specific terms of your PPI (if known).
Gather any evidence of mis-selling, such as marketing materials, call transcripts, or letters that mention the policy.
Contact the lender directly, either online, by phone, or through a written letter.
Explain why you believe you were mis-sold (e.g., the policy was unsuitable for your employment status).
Keep copies of all correspondence.
Provide statements or records that show how much you paid for PPI.
Include emails or letters where you questioned the policy or expressed confusion about its necessity.
Most lenders must respond within eight weeks, at least indicating their decision or the need for more time.
If you receive an offer, check the compensation amount carefully to ensure it matches what you paid, plus relevant interest.
If you are rejected, make note of the reasons given—these can be challenged.
If unsatisfied, or if the lender does not respond after eight weeks, approach the FOS for a free independent review.
Fill in their complaint form and attach all relevant documents.
Staying organised is key. Maintain a chronology of every communication, the dates you submitted queries, and contacts made. This structure not only clarifies your position but helps if you need to escalate. While some claims resolve in a matter of weeks, others require patience, especially if you have incomplete records or extensive back-and-forth with the lender.
Strong evidence underpins a successful PPI claim. Lenders and adjudicators often rely on documentation to determine whether the policy was indeed mis-sold. Providing thorough, easy-to-understand proof can significantly boost your likelihood of receiving compensation.
Useful evidence includes:
Original loan or credit agreements
Confirm whether PPI was included and how it was presented in the contract.
Periodic statements
Highlight how much you paid in premiums over time.
Emails and letters from the lender
Indicate if you questioned the policy or expressed confusion.
Employment and medical information
Show if you were self-employed, unemployed, or had pre-existing conditions that the policy would not cover.
Detailed, relevant evidence can significantly bolster your case, fostering a swift resolution in your favour.
If you no longer have these papers, a Subject Access Request (SAR) can help retrieve lender-held details like records of phone calls or archived statements. When presenting your case, explain succinctly why you believe the policy was unsuitable or misrepresented. The more concise and organised you are, the more straightforward it is for lenders or the Financial Ombudsman Service to understand the basis of your claim and reach a fair conclusion.
Despite the scale of PPI mis-selling, not all claims succeed. Understanding the typical reasons for rejection makes it easier to plan a robust argument from the start.
Insufficient evidence
If your complaint is minimal or lacks specific details about how the policy was mis-sold, the lender may dismiss it.
Policy deemed appropriate
The lender might argue that the PPI genuinely suited your needs, citing circumstances like full-time employment with no health issues at the time of sale.
Missed deadlines
Claims lodged after the primary 2019 cut-off may automatically be rejected unless you present compelling reasons for lateness.
No proof of policy
In some cases, if the lender cannot trace records or you cannot demonstrate you paid PPI, it may lead to a refusal.
A clear demonstration of how your personal conditions at the time made the policy unsuitable can often tip the scales towards a successful claim.
If you are rejected, or offered partial compensation, you can present additional evidence and request another review. Should the lender maintain its position, escalating the complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service is your next step. Being aware of these pitfalls upfront can help you shore up your application and avoid unnecessary delays.
Many consumers appeal a negative verdict by strengthening their case with further data or seeking an impartial review from the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS). A rejection does not have to be the end of the road.
Revisit the rejection letter
Determine the exact reason given for refusal. It may be that you need to provide more thorough documentation or clarity on how mis-selling took place.
Gather new evidence
Statements showing you would not have benefited from the policy.
Proof of other insurance coverage you already had.
Documentation of your employment status or medical condition, if relevant.
If you suspect the lender overlooked or misunderstood critical facts, your first move is to request a more detailed explanation, clarifying why you believe their conclusion is flawed.
Resubmit your complaint
Contact the lender again, referencing the new evidence. Ask for a fresh review, especially if you previously lacked essential documents.
Escalate to the FOS
If the lender stands by its decision, or eight weeks pass with no resolution, you can file a complaint with the FOS. Submitting an FOS complaint requires completion of their form and providing supporting documents. The FOS will then evaluate whether your lender behaved fairly.
Persistence and clarity remain key here. Many second-look claims succeed when the consumer bridges information gaps and addresses the lender’s reasons for rejection. Document each communication and keep track of timelines to ensure you don’t miss further deadlines.
When your claim is upheld, your compensation usually includes a refund of the premiums you paid, plus interest intended to return you to the financial position you would have been in if not for the mis-sold policy.
Components of a typical PPI refund:
Premiums paid
The total amount you spent on the policy, whether monthly or via a single lump sum.
Associated interest
Usually 8% simple interest per year on the money you paid for PPI.
Other charges
In some cases, if paying for PPI caused you to exceed credit limits or incur late fees, these might also be refunded.
The inclusion of 8% interest is intended to put the consumer back in the position they would have been in had they not been mis-sold the policy.
Below is a short table illustrating a hypothetical scenario of premium refunds plus interest:
Year | Annual PPI Paid (£) | 8% Interest for 1 Year (£) | Potential Refund (£) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 250 | 20 | 270 |
2 | 250 | 20 | 270 |
3 | 250 | 20 | 270 |
4 | 250 | 20 | 270 |
Total | 1,000 | 80 | 1,080 |
In real claims, the sums and timings can be more complex, especially with single-premium PPI or if you had varying payments over time. Upon receiving the lender’s calculation, examine the breakdown carefully. If you suspect it is inaccurate or incomplete, query the lender for clarification, or contact the Financial Ombudsman Service if discussions stall.
Although reclaiming mis-sold PPI is free if you do it yourself, you might encounter costs if you enlist outside services. Claims management companies (CMCs) and some legal firms can handle the entire process, but they often charge a percentage of any successful payout or a fixed fee.
Common fee structures:
Claims management company (CMC) fees
Many CMCs operate on a “no win, no fee” basis but charge a high percentage of the redress—often between 10% and 30% including VAT.
Solicitor fees
If you choose a solicitor for a complex case, you may be billed hourly or under a conditional fee arrangement.
Possible tax deduction
The 8% statutory interest added to your payout can be taxable, though lenders often deduct basic-rate tax upfront.
Before entering into any deal with a CMC, be sure to ask for a detailed breakdown of their fees and how they calculate them.
Below is a short table explaining typical fee differences when reclaiming PPI:
Provider | Approximate Fee Range | Additional Considerations |
---|---|---|
Claims management company | 10%–30% of final settlement (incl. VAT) | Check for upfront or cancellation fees |
Solicitor | Hourly or success-based (varies widely) | May offer specialised services |
Independent (DIY) | £0 | Time-intensive but keeps all payout |
If you choose to handle your claim directly with the lender, your out-of-pocket cost should be nil, aside from any postage or administrative fees for document requests. Perform a cost-benefit analysis if you consider professional help; if your potential payout is modest, a large chunk could be lost to fees.
When considering a PPI claim, deciding whether to do it yourself or work with a claims management company (CMC) is fundamental. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages, and what’s “best” often depends on your confidence and availability to deal with the process.
Pros
No fees: You keep all your compensation.
Direct control: You communicate personally with the lender and keep track of every step.
Simplicity: Modern complaint forms are widely available, and the Financial Ombudsman Service is free.
Cons
Time commitment: Requires compiling evidence and drafting complaint letters yourself.
Potentially daunting: Some consumers feel unsure about tackling complex or older loan situations.
Tackling a PPI claim independently is entirely feasible, and consumers should not feel pressured into paying for a third-party service.
Pros
Cons
Below is a short table summarising the pros and cons:
Approach | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Claiming independently | Zero fees, direct control, free help via the Ombudsman | Time-consuming, potentially complicated for older accounts |
Using a CMC | Convenience, some have expertise in tricky cases | Fees reduce your net payout, beware of unscrupulous operators |
Your choice may rest on whether you are comfortable managing your complaint without professional help. If you have spare time and can gather the evidence, it might be best to go solo and retain all compensation. If convenience is paramount or your situation is complex, paying for support could be worthwhile—just ensure you fully understand the fee structure.
Once you have sent your PPI complaint to the lender, you will typically receive a letter acknowledging receipt of your submission. The lender then begins investigating:
Confirmation: Within a few days up to two weeks, you should get an acknowledgement.
Review phase: The lender investigates paperwork, possibly contacting you for extra information. They have up to eight weeks under FCA guidelines to respond with a formal decision.
Patience is key. While some claims wrap up swiftly, others require careful evidence review or clarifications, potentially prolonging the process.
After the review:
If your claim is upheld, you receive an offer detailing how much you are owed (premiums plus interest).
If partially accepted or refused, the letter explains the lender’s reasoning. You can either accept, negotiate, appeal, or escalate your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.
Keeping documentation of every contact is wise. Confirm important discussions in writing, note call dates, and save any letters or emails from the lender. An organised paper trail can prove invaluable, especially if you need to argue your case further.
Delays can occur at various stages, so understanding typical timeframes helps you plan and remain patient:
Initial acknowledgement
Usually within a week or two of your complaint submission.
Lender investigation
By regulatory standards, lenders should respond in full within eight weeks, although complex cases might take longer.
Financial Ombudsman Service escalation
If you are unsatisfied or receive no response, you can contact the FOS. They aim to handle complaints as swiftly as possible, but complicated cases can take several months.
If the lender fails to respond within eight weeks, you have the right to escalate the complaint to the Ombudsman.
Factors such as missing documentation, multiple credit accounts, or high volumes of claims can extend the timeline. Be proactive about following up if you sense unwarranted delay. Once you reach a settlement agreement, expect a few more weeks before you receive the actual payout.
Most of your PPI refund—specifically the premiums you initially paid—will not be taxed. However, the 8% simple interest included to compensate you for being deprived of that money is often treated as taxable income in the UK.
Statutory interest
This is commonly taxed at the basic rate (20%), and lenders frequently deduct that amount before sending you your compensation.
Depending on your total tax situation, you may be eligible to claim back any overpaid tax on the interest portion by contacting HMRC.
Should you be a higher-rate taxpayer, you may owe additional tax if the withheld amount was not sufficient. Conversely, if your income is below the threshold or you have unused annual Personal Savings Allowance, you could reclaim some or all of the tax paid, using an R40 form or an online self-assessment return.
Because PPI reclaiming has been so widely publicised, scammers have tried to exploit consumers. Recognising potential scams protects you from losing personal data or money.
Watch out for:
Cold calls or unsolicited texts
Fraudsters may claim you have a guaranteed payout awaiting you if you send a fee or share your bank details.
Clone firms
Some emails or letters closely mimic legitimate lenders or claims management providers, aiming to collect your personal information.
Too-good-to-be-true promises
No reputable organisation can guarantee success before reviewing specific evidence of mis-selling.
Never hand over sensitive personal or financial details based solely on unsolicited phone calls or emails claiming you are owed PPI refunds.
Stay alert if someone pressures you aggressively or requests unusual information. Report any suspicious approaches to the Financial Conduct Authority, Action Fraud, or your local Citizens Advice centre. Protect your personal data and never provide bank account details, National Insurance numbers, or other sensitive information without verifying the identity of the requesting organisation.
Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) mis-selling remains one of the most significant consumer finance scandals in recent UK history. While a major PPI deadline has passed, late discoveries or extenuating circumstances mean many consumers can still look into whether they had PPI—and if that policy was mis-sold.
By understanding PPI’s background, identifying whether you held it, and recognising the various mis-selling tactics used, you are well-positioned to check your eligibility and gather the evidence needed to support your claim. The process itself can be time-consuming, especially if you need to retrieve old documents or contact multiple lenders. Nonetheless, compensation often includes a full refund of all premiums paid, alongside an interest element intended to return you to the financial state you might have enjoyed otherwise.
Large-scale mis-selling has also fostered new risks—particularly scams—and raised questions about fees for claims management services. You can handle most claims free of charge by going directly to your lender, and the Financial Ombudsman Service is similarly cost-free if an appeal is necessary. While certain complex cases prompt some to entrust the job to experts, it’s essential to weigh any potential fees against the likely compensation.
Ultimately, thorough preparation—compiling documents, setting out a clear narrative of why the policy was unsuitable, and being willing to escalate to the Financial Ombudsman if needed—forms the cornerstone of a robust claim. With the right approach and evidence, many have recovered significant sums from financial institutions that once sold them PPI unfairly.
Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) covers repayments on loans, credit cards, or mortgages if you become unable to work due to illness, accident, or unemployment.
PPI was often sold to people taking out loans, mortgages, credit cards, or finance agreements, usually without full disclosure or proper explanation.
Most claims had a deadline of 29 August 2019, but exceptions exist if you only recently discovered the mis-selling or had exceptional circumstances.
Check your original agreements, statements, or contact your lender to request historical documents confirming PPI presence.
You should provide credit agreements, statements showing PPI payments, any related correspondence, and evidence of your employment or medical status if relevant.
Most lenders respond within eight weeks, though more complicated cases or escalations to the Financial Ombudsman Service can take months.
You can request documents directly from your lender through a Subject Access Request (SAR), requiring them to send you any personal data they hold.
You can manage claims yourself at no cost, but some prefer professional help, especially if their case is complex.
Yes, you can appeal by providing additional evidence, clarifying your claim, or escalating to the Financial Ombudsman Service if unsatisfied with your lender’s response.
Common reasons include insufficient evidence, missed deadlines, or the lender claiming the policy was appropriate for your circumstances.
Yes, it’s an independent body providing free adjudication if you’re unsatisfied with your lender’s final response.
Compensation typically includes the premiums paid, plus 8% annual statutory interest on the total amount.
The premium refund itself isn’t taxable, but the statutory interest portion is usually taxed at the basic rate (20%) before you receive it.
If you’re eligible, reclaim tax by completing form R40 or submitting a self-assessment tax return to HMRC.
Typically, payments arrive within four to six weeks after accepting the lender’s compensation offer.
You may claim through the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) or approach the company that acquired your lender.
Yes, as an executor or beneficiary, you can pursue claims on behalf of the deceased’s estate.
Yes, each policy should be individually assessed for potential mis-selling.
Beware of unsolicited calls or texts promising guaranteed payouts or asking for fees upfront—genuine claims don’t require these.
Report any suspected scams to Action Fraud, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), or Citizens Advice.
Citizens Advice and the Financial Ombudsman Service both provide free guidance and support throughout the claims process.
Yes, Citizens Advice can guide you on making your claim clearer and stronger, and help you escalate issues if necessary.
If you’re unsure about any aspect of making a Payment Protection Insurance claim—such as verifying eligibility, handling a complex mis-selling situation, or understanding how interest is calculated—you can speak directly with an expert for personalised guidance. This specialised advice can clarify your unique circumstances and help you determine the next steps in pursuing a successful claim.
An assessment conducted by lenders to verify whether borrowers could realistically afford PPI alongside their loan or credit repayments.
A business that helps consumers manage financial compensation claims, including mis-sold PPI, typically charging fees based on successful outcomes.
The unsolicited marketing practice often associated with PPI scams, where individuals are contacted unexpectedly via phone to encourage claims.
A sum paid to sales representatives or banks for selling PPI policies, sometimes contributing to mis-selling due to incentives.
Financial reimbursement provided to consumers who have been mis-sold PPI, usually including premiums paid plus statutory interest.
UK legislation that regulates credit agreements, relevant in cases where PPI was included within these agreements.
A formal contract between a borrower and lender outlining loan terms and repayment conditions, often including details of any insurance such as PPI.
A variant of PPI specifically sold with credit cards, designed to cover payments during periods of financial hardship.
The final date, set by the FCA as 29 August 2019, by which most PPI mis-selling claims had to be submitted, unless exceptions apply.
Specific circumstances under which PPI would not pay out, often poorly communicated to consumers, leading to claims of mis-selling.
The UK regulatory body responsible for overseeing financial services, including the supervision of PPI complaint handling and related consumer protection.
An independent organisation providing impartial adjudication on disputes between consumers and financial service providers regarding PPI and other financial products.
A government-backed scheme offering compensation if a financial institution cannot pay claims due to insolvency or closure.
A landmark decision affecting PPI claims, highlighting the need for transparency on commissions paid, potentially making additional compensation available.
A professional who provides unbiased financial advice to consumers, relevant in clarifying suitability of products such as PPI.
Regular payments made to maintain a PPI policy, usually added to monthly loan repayments or charged as a lump sum.
Alternative terminology sometimes used for PPI, indicating a policy designed specifically to safeguard loan repayments.
Selling a financial product under misleading or inappropriate circumstances, frequently associated with widespread malpractice in PPI sales.
A type of PPI specifically covering mortgage repayments in the event of unemployment, sickness, or injury.
An arrangement common among claims management companies, where fees are only payable if a compensation claim succeeds.
The final determination by the Financial Ombudsman Service, binding on financial institutions but optional for consumers to accept.
Policies like PPI that were supposed to be voluntary but often misrepresented as mandatory during sales pitches.
Another alternative term for PPI, implying temporary suspension of repayments covered by insurance if specific conditions are met.
Insurance intended to cover loan or credit repayments if policyholders become unemployed, injured, or seriously ill.
The official document submitted to a lender or claims handler detailing the reasons a consumer believes their PPI was mis-sold.
An online or manual tool used to estimate the amount of compensation due from mis-sold PPI policies, including interest payments.
Unique reference number assigned to each PPI agreement, necessary when submitting a complaint or claim.
Medical conditions present before taking out PPI, often leading to invalid claims or disputed coverage if undisclosed or ignored at sale.
Repayment of premiums initially paid for mis-sold PPI, typically forming part of compensation.
The formal cut-off established by the FCA (29 August 2019), which limited the time frame to lodge most PPI claims.
PPI policies sold by charging the full premium upfront, frequently financed as part of the loan amount, causing increased overall borrowing costs.
Legal time limits within which claims can be made; relevant for PPI claims in determining late eligibility after the main deadline.
The 8% annual interest rate typically added to PPI compensation, intended to reflect lost financial opportunity.
A formal request under data protection law allowing consumers to access all personal data held by lenders, useful for locating hidden or forgotten PPI.
A required evaluation to determine whether a financial product like PPI was genuinely appropriate for a consumer’s specific circumstances.
Automatic deduction of basic-rate income tax from the interest portion of PPI compensation payments by lenders before consumers receive their refunds.
The complete cost of a loan including interest and fees, such as PPI, often obscured to consumers at the point of sale.
An aspect of PPI providing temporary repayments if the policyholder becomes involuntarily unemployed, subject to stringent criteria.
Contractual clauses identified by regulators or courts as excessively disadvantageous to consumers, relevant to PPI exclusions and conditions.
The consumer's right to terminate a PPI policy voluntarily, with potential entitlement to partial refunds if terms were unclear or mis-sold.
The formal process of submitting documented dissatisfaction about PPI mis-selling directly to the financial institution involved, initiating the claim procedure.
Action Fraud is the UK's national reporting centre for fraud and cybercrime. They handle reports of scams, including PPI-related fraud and misleading claim services, and provide advice on protecting yourself from fraud.
Phone: 0300 123 2040
Website: www.actionfraud.police.uk
Citizens Advice offers free, confidential, and impartial advice to UK residents on a variety of financial issues, including managing PPI claims, understanding eligibility, and dealing with complaints about financial products.
Phone: 0800 144 8848 (England), 0800 702 2020 (Wales)
Website: www.citizensadvice.org.uk
The FCA is the regulatory authority overseeing financial markets in the UK, ensuring fair treatment of consumers, handling regulation around PPI claims, and providing guidance on your rights regarding financial products.
Phone: 0800 111 6768
Website: www.fca.org.uk
The FOS is an independent body designed to resolve disputes between consumers and financial businesses. If you’re dissatisfied with your lender’s handling of your PPI complaint, the FOS offers a free and impartial resolution service.
Phone: 0800 023 4567
Website: www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk
The FSCS provides protection and compensation if a financial institution goes out of business and is unable to pay claims. This can include compensation for valid PPI claims if the original provider no longer exists.
Phone: 0800 678 1100
Website: www.fscs.org.uk
MoneySavingExpert is a consumer finance information service that provides detailed guidance, templates, and advice on managing personal finance, including step-by-step help in reclaiming mis-sold PPI.
Phone: Not available (online resource only)
Website: www.moneysavingexpert.com
Which? is an independent consumer rights organisation providing advice, information, and guidance on financial products, including comprehensive resources on how to identify mis-sold PPI and claim compensation effectively.
Phone: 029 2267 0000
Website: www.which.co.uk
Citizens Advice, 2020. Payment Protection Insurance – check if you can complain about mis-sold PPI. https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/consumer/insurance/problems-with-insurance-policies/payment-protection-insurance/check-if-you-can-complain-about-mis-sold-ppi/
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), 2019. FCA finalises plans to place a deadline on PPI complaints. https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-finalise-plans-place-deadline-ppi-complaints
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), 2019. PPI complaints deadline and handling. https://www.fca.org.uk/consumers/ppi-complaints
Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), 2022. Complaints we deal with – Payment Protection Insurance (PPI). https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/businesses/complaints-deal/ppi
MoneySavingExpert, 2021. PPI reclaiming: Tools and templates. https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/reclaim/ppi-loan-insurance/
Which?, 2022. Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) explained. https://www.which.co.uk/money/insurance/payment-protection-insurance
Proudly supporting:
We donate to Charity when you use one of our partners.
Information
We donate to Charity when you use one of our partners.